NONMEM Users Network Archive

Hosted by Cognigen

RE: OFV higher with FOCEI than FO

From: Hussein, Ziad <Ziad.Hussein>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:07:30 -0000

Hi Ayyappa,
 
Your understanding is correct that the objective functions from FOCEI
and FO can not be compared.
 
Regards,
Ziad
Dr Ziad Hussein
Senior Director, Pharmacometrics
ICON Development Solutions
Manchester
United Kingdom

________________________________

From: owner-nmusers
On Behalf Of ayyappa.5.chaturvedula
Sent: 10 December 2008 14:40
To: owner-nmusers
Subject: [NMusers] OFV higher with FOCEI than FO



Dear All,

I am analyzing a data set pooled from 4 clinical studies with rich
sampling. When I fit a 2 comp oral absorption model with lag time using
FO, I got successful minimization with COV step, but minimization was
not successful when I used FO parameter estimates as initial estimates
for FOCE run. When I used FOCE with INTER minimization was successful
with COV step but the OFV is much higher (~25000 vs 20000) with FOCEI
estimation than FO. The parameter estimates make more sense with FOCEI
than FO. My questions are,

Can we get something like this or I am missing something here?
Can we compare OFV between different estimation methods (my
understanding is no and OFV in case of FO does not make a lot of sense)?



Regards,
Ayyappa Chaturvedula
GlaxoSmithKline
1500 Littleton Road,
Parsippany, NJ 07054
Ph:9738892200



ICON plc made the following annotations.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged i=
nformation
that is intended only for the individual or entity named in the e-mail ad=
dress. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosu=
re, copying,
distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly pr=
ohibited. If
you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please reply to the =
sender, so that
ICON plc can arrange for proper delivery, and then please delete the mess=
age.
Thank You,
ICON plc
South County Business Park
Leopardstown
Dublin 18
Ireland
Registered number: 145835

Received on Wed Dec 10 2008 - 10:07:30 EST

The NONMEM Users Network is maintained by ICON plc. Requests to subscribe to the network should be sent to: nmusers-request@iconplc.com.

Once subscribed, you may contribute to the discussion by emailing: nmusers@globomaxnm.com.