NONMEM Users Network Archive

Hosted by Cognigen

RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR

From: Wang, Yaning <yaning.wang>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:54:54 -0500

Another possible reason could be that you have a huge number of subjects
in your database. Then a tiny deviation from zero will generate a highly
significant p-value (very small). You should look at the estimate itself
too (ETABAR).
 

Yaning Wang, Ph.D.
Team Leader, Pharmacometrics
Office of Clinical Pharmacology
Office of Translational Science
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Phone: 301-796-1624
Email: yaning.wang

"The contents of this message are mine personally and do not necessarily
reflect any position of the Government or the Food and Drug
Administration."

 

________________________________

From: owner-nmusers
On Behalf Of Jian Xu
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 11:32 AM
To: Denney, William S.; NM Users
Subject: Re: [NMusers] Very small P-Value for ETABAR


Hi, Bill,
 
Thanks for your input. I also got some answers from Mahesh, Yaning, and
Pankaj. Thank you guys!
 
This small P-value for ETABAR could be due to possible two reasons:
1: As Bill and Yaning suggested, this ETA is non-nomal distribuated,
which could result from covariates (e.g. gender) or mixture of
population (e.g. race)
2: As Mahesh and Pankaj suggested, the shrinkage of this ETA needs to be
calculated, which can help identify whether the model is ill
conditioning or overparameterized .
 
Cheers,
 
Jian

 

________________________________

From: Denney, William S. <william_denney
To: Jian Xu <alanub
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 10:41:15 AM
Subject: RE: [NMusers] Very small P-Value for ETABAR


Hi Jian,
 
I would look for a covariate effect on that parameter.
 
Thanks,
 
Bill

________________________________

From: owner-nmusers
On Behalf Of Jian Xu
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 10:16 AM
To: nmusers
Subject: [NMusers] Very small P-Value for ETABAR


Dear NMUSERS,
 
A few years back, there was a discussion on the P-value for ETABAR.
However, I am not sure how to appropriately handle very small P-value(s)
for ETABAR situation during the development of a model.
 
I need some clarifications to a few questions:
1: Should we just ignore this small P-Value warning?
2: Can we change IIV model to avoid small P-value for ETABAR? Or any
other suggestions?
3: Does NONMEM make any assumptions on ETA distribution?
 
This P-value for ETABAR really bugs me a lot. I look forward to seeing
some input.
 
Thank you and I appreicate your time and help.
 
Jian

Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station,
New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known
outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or
MSD and in Japan, as Banyu - direct contact information for affiliates
is
available at http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be
confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this
message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and
then delete it from your system.


Received on Thu Nov 13 2008 - 11:54:54 EST

The NONMEM Users Network is maintained by ICON plc. Requests to subscribe to the network should be sent to: nmusers-request@iconplc.com.

Once subscribed, you may contribute to the discussion by emailing: nmusers@globomaxnm.com.