NONMEM Users Network Archive

Hosted by Cognigen

Re: NONMEM memory vs. run time

From: Darin Perusich <Darin.Perusich>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:23:53 -0400

The increase in memory consumption doesn't impact runtime positively or
negatively, unless of course your system doesn't have enough physical
memory to accommodate the increase. NONMEM's memory footprint is
directly related to the buffer values in the SIZES file, as you increase
the values the memory footprint increases to accommodate.

In the end processor speed is really the only thing that positively or
negatively effects NONMEM runtime.

Leonid Gibiansky wrote:
> Dear All,
> I noticed that the Nonmem installed with NMQUAL "big nm6" defaults
> instead of the standard ones results in approximately 10-times increase
> in the memory required to run Nonmem (on my recent problem, from 12 MB
> to 140 MB). I am wondering whether anybody checked how this influences
> the run time. Is it better (in terms of the run time) to use standard
> sizes, or "big" is OK if you have enough RAM?
> Thanks!
> Leonid
>

--
Darin Perusich
Unix Systems Administrator
Cognigen Corporation
395 Youngs Rd.
Williamsville, NY 14221
Phone: 716-633-3463
Email: darinper
Received on Mon Sep 08 2008 - 08:23:53 EDT

The NONMEM Users Network is maintained by ICON plc. Requests to subscribe to the network should be sent to: nmusers-request@iconplc.com.

Once subscribed, you may contribute to the discussion by emailing: nmusers@globomaxnm.com.