NONMEM Users Network Archive

Hosted by Cognigen

RE: distribution assumption of Eta in NONMEM

From: Ribbing, Jakob <Jakob.Ribbing>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:10:44 +0100

Dear all,


Dropping in a little late in the game all I can say is this:

Shame on all you great minds for reinventing your own wisdom :>)


Most of the content in the current thread has already been discussed in
an earlier thread:


However, this old thread does contain a lot of postings and quite a few
which are VERY confusing, so you may want to skip ahead to Matt's
posting here:

(There are also many other postings which are very useful, but the one
above captures the essence with regards to the original question in the
current thread)


That said I think there are always new learnings in each thread, as
people tend to express themselves differently and the original question
branch into several new discussion points.

So I guess there are never two threads that are exactly alike, even when
the usual suspects participate in both.







Received on Tue Jun 01 2010 - 03:10:44 EDT

The NONMEM Users Network is maintained by ICON plc. Requests to subscribe to the network should be sent to:

Once subscribed, you may contribute to the discussion by emailing: