NONMEM Users Network Archive

Hosted by Cognigen

Re: distribution assumption of Eta in NONMEM

From: Ethan Wu <ethan.wu75>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 07:03:46 -0700 (PDT)

Dear Jakob and all,     In this thread, Mats clearly indic=
ated Eta is assumed normal distributed. But, others have said differently.=

______________________________ From: "Ribbing, Jakob" <Jakob.Ribbing> To: nmusers <nmusers
10:44 AM Subject: RE: [NMusers] distribution assumption of Eta in NONMEM=

an say is this: Shame on all you great minds for reinventing your own wis=
dom :>)   Most of the content in the current thread has already be=
en discussed in an earlier thread:   However, this old thread does contain=
 a lot of postings and quite a few which are VERY confusing, so you may wan=
t to skip ahead to Matt’s posting here: http://www.mail-archive.c=
gs which are very useful, but the one above captures the essence with regar=
ds to the original question in the current thread)   That said I t=
hink there are always new learnings in each thread, as people tend to expre=
ss themselves differently and the original question branch into several new=
 discussion points. So I guess there are never two threads that are exact=
ly alike, even when the usual suspects participate in both.   Che=
ers   Jakob
Received on Tue Jun 01 2010 - 10:03:46 EDT

The NONMEM Users Network is maintained by ICON plc. Requests to subscribe to the network should be sent to:

Once subscribed, you may contribute to the discussion by emailing: