NONMEM Users Network Archive

Hosted by Cognigen

RE: NONMEM 7.2 maximum parallelization nodes

From: Dodds, Mike <mdodds>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:58:47 -0700

Dear Bob,

Thank you for the response, and I'll pass this along to our internal team.

Warm Regards,
Mike Dodds

From: owner-nmusers
 Behalf Of Bauer, Robert
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:53 AM
To: nmusers
Cc: Manjunatha Shivaiah (BLR GSS)
Subject: [NMusers] FW: NONMEM 7.2 maximum parallelization nodes

Dear nmusers:
I notice from our programming group (Nous InfoSystems) reveals no difficult=
ies regarding changing PNM_MAXNODES.

Robert J. Bauer, Ph.D.
Vice President, Pharmacometrics, R&D
ICON Development Solutions
7740 Milestone Parkway
Suite 150
Hanover, MD 21076
Tel: (215) 616-6428
Mob: (925) 286-0769
Email: Robert.Bauer

From: Manjunatha Shivaiah [mailto:manjunathas
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 7:03 AM
To: Bauer, Robert
Subject: FW: NONMEM 7.2 maximum parallelization nodes
Dear Bob,

We have compiled the latest nonmem7.3 source code by defining PNM_MAXNODES=
=110 on Linux platform using Intel compiler. There is no issue with compi=

We have also executed testseries11\control test case with 110 nodes across =
the system on Linux platform using MPI. It executed without any issue.

May be you want to communicate the same to nmusers group.

Best regards,

P Print this email only if unavoidable!!

From: owner-nmusers
 Behalf Of Dodds, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:03 PM
To: nmusers
Subject: [NMusers] NONMEM 7.2 maximum parallelization nodes


SIZES.f90 contains the parameter "PNM_MAXNODES" with the default of 100 nod=
es. Have others encountered problems increasing this number and recompilin=
g? It's not clear that this is an issue, but it would be extremely useful =
to hear that someone else in the community has successfully used >100 node =



ICON plc made the following annotations.


This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged inf=

that is intended only for the individual or entity named in the e-mail addr=
ess. If you

are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure=
, copying,

distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly proh=
ibited. If

you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please reply to the se=
nder, so that

ICON plc can arrange for proper delivery, and then please delete the messag=

Thank You,

ICON plc

South County Business Park


Dublin 18


Registered number: 145835

Received on Wed Aug 29 2012 - 12:58:47 EDT

The NONMEM Users Network is maintained by ICON plc. Requests to subscribe to the network should be sent to:

Once subscribed, you may contribute to the discussion by emailing: